Gentry v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The general rule is that fraud must be made out by a preponderance of evidence which should be so clear and strong as to preponderate over the general and reasonable assumption that men are honest and do not ordinarily commit fraud or act in bad faith
• influencing juror in civil case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Cushman Bakery and Cushman Baking Company. Appeal of Jacob Agger, Trustee
  First Circuit· 1976-04-19· cited 70×
• Firfer Et Ux. v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1953-12-10· cited 62×
• Arthur v. Standard Engineering Co.
  D.C. Circuit· 1951-10-25· cited 38×
• New World Marketing Corp. v. Garcia (In Re Garcia)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-07-20· cited 26×
• Chittenden Trust Co. v. Mayo (In Re Mayo)
  D. Vermont· 1988-12-07· cited 19×
• Barr v. Overmyer (In Re Overmyer)
  S.D. New York· 1990-10-29· cited 18×
• Elton P. Lord and Geneva Lord v. Lencshire House, Ltd., Lencshire House, Ltd. v. Elton P. Lord and Geneva Lord
  D.C. Circuit· 1959-12-18· cited 14×
• Clemens v. Cobley (In Re Cobley)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-08-05· cited 14×
• Eastburn v. Levin
  D.C. Circuit· 1940-05-13· cited 14×
• Bachner v. Robinson
  Second Circuit· 1939-11-06· cited 13×
• Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 1990-02-15· cited 3×
• United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.
  W.D. New York· 1940-01-17· cited 2×