Gentile v. SinglePoint Financial, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying indemnification for intervenor where party’s claims would not necessarily be barred in subsequent proceeding
• The former director‟s intervention in the corporation‟s action against its client was not the same as a compulsory counterclaim under Citadel, because the director “was not faced with a „use-it-or-lose-it‟ scenario . . .”
• “[I]t has become common corporate practice to adopt mandatory indemnification and advancement provisions. Where such a mandatory provision exists, the rights of potential recipients of such advancements will be enforced as a contract.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).