Skip to main content
· 5/18/1973

Genosick v. Richmond Unified School District

Citations

  • 479 F.2d 482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding district court's reliance on letter written by defendant over one year after stipulation was entered into as evidence of meaning of ambiguous provision
  • appeal allowed where notice of appeal filed after the decision but before entry of judgment; judgment not entered until after argument of the appeal
  • “[t]he district court has not only the power, but the duty to enforce the stipulation which it had approved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Curtis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.