Gennadiy Volodarskiy v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “asking a U.S. court to wade into an area of [European] law that is fraught with uncertainty risks offending principles of international comity’
• observing that \asking a U.S. court to wade into an area of [European] law that is fraught with uncertainty risks offending principles of international comity\
• holding that the plaintiff could not bring a claim in a United States court under a European Union airfare regulation because, “when read together, [the regulation’s] provisions establish[ed] that direct actions to enforce [the contract] rights are limited to courts in EU Member States”
• notwithstanding federal jurisdiction, private right of action under EU law not cognizable or .“judicially enforceable”
• “[W]e conclude that EU 261 is not judicially enforceable outside the courts of EU Member States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).