Geneva Mays v. Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[t]he plain language of § 7701(j) means that retirement status cannot be taken into account in determining the appealability of 'any case involving a removal' \
• holding that the Board retains jurisdiction over an appeal if an employee retires when faced with an agency’s final decision to remove her
• holding that, under 5 U.S.C. § 7701(j), an employee who is “stigmatized with an adverse final decision reflected in her government employment record, may challenge the final removal decision while also opting to retire”
• determining that, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7701(j), an employee, “stigmatized with an adverse final decision reflected in her government employment record, may challenge the final removal decision while also opting to retire”
• stating that the Board’s jurisdiction does not extend to proposed removals
• “[T]he agency does not dispute that Mays would not have retired when she did if it had not been for the removal action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).