Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that an injured employee could intervene in a timely suit brought by the employer despite lapse of statute of limitations
• “We turn, then, to the second question - whether the 15 1-17-0385 claim of plaintiff [employee], which was first asserted by an amendment to the complaint *** is barred by the Statute of Limitations.”
• “We turn, then, to the second question - whether the 15 1-17-0385 claim of plaintiff [employee], which was first asserted by an amendment to the complaint *** is barred by the Statute of Limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).