Geneva College v. Secretary United States DePartment of Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the different treatment of dioceses and affiliated organizations does not impose a substantial burden
• determining it was permissible for the Departments to base the exemption on the 1 IRC’s provision “because that provision was a bright line that was already statutorily codified and frequently applied”
• determining it was permissible for the Departments to base the exemption on the IRC’s provision “because that provision was a bright line that was already statutorily codified and frequently applied”
• “[T]he Court does not decide whether petitioners’ religious exercise has been substantially burdened … .”
• “If anything, because the appellees specifically state on the self-certification form that they object on religious grounds to providing such coverage, it is a declaration that they will not be complicit in providing coverage.”
• “If anything, because the appellees specifically state on the self-certification form that they object on religious grounds to providing such coverage, it is a declaration that they will not be complicit in providing coverage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).