Generica Limited v. Pharmaceutical Basics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying 9 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. when reviewing arbitral award issued pursuant to an arbitration clause that called for the agreement to be interpreted \in accordance with English law\
• applying 9 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. when reviewing arbitral award issued pursuant to an arbitration clause that called for the agreement to be interpreted “in accordance with English law”
• clarifying Art. V(1)(b) to be a due process defense “as our jurisprudence defines it”
• \Arbitration proceedings are not constrained by formal rules or procedure or evidence.\
• “The extent of an arbitrator’s 30 latitude is such that an “arbitrator is not bound to hear all of the evidence tendered by the parties . . . [H]e must [merely] give each of the parties to the dispute an adequate opportunity to present its evidence and arguments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).