Genereux v. Raytheon Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the admission of new expert evidence would cause prejudice where it would require the parties to take additional depositions and reinterview experts
• noting that the admission of new expert evidence would cause prejudice where it would require the parties to take additional depositions and reinterview experts
• “increased epidemiological risk of illness caused by exposure, unaccompanied by some subcellular or other physiological damage, is not enough to permit recovery in tort.”
• summary judgment appropriate where plaintiffs’ expert failed to testify that any member of the class “had already suffered harm (that is, subcellular or other physiological change)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).