Generes v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs have standing because they allege that they avoid a public park where a cross is located
• holding that the plaintiffs have standing because they allege that they avoid a public park where a cross is located
• holding that the plaintiffs have standing because they allege that they avoid a public park where a cross is located
• holding that a plaintiff satisfied the injury-in-fact requirement by alleging that he was “offended” by the presence of a cross on public property, which he “otherwise would visit” but instead “avoids”
• holding that a plaintiff satisfied the injury-in-fact requirement by alleging that he was “offended” by the presence of a cross on public property, which he “otherwise would visit” but instead “avoids”
• holding that San Diego’s ownership of the Mount Helix Cross, a 36-foot Latin cross in a public park, and the Mount Soledad Cross, a 43-, foot Latin cross in a public park, violated California’s No Preference Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).