Skip to main content
· 1/3/1973

General Valet Service, Inc. v. Curley

Citations

  • 298 A.2d 190
  • 16 Md. App. 453
  • 1973 Md. App. LEXIS 381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relevant evidence would be that which showed that defendant knew, or from facts known to it should have known, that its employee, because of a habit of incompetent driving, was likely to use a van in a dangerous manner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Powers, Gilbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.