Fifth Circuit· 9/17/2007

General Universal Systems, Inc. v. Hal, Inc.

Citations

500 F.3d 444
84 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1436
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22210
2007 WL 2696885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

interpreting Texas law in holding that “use” included using the plaintiffs product to “accelerate the development and marketability” of a defendant’s own product
stating “the mandate rule requires a district court on remand to effect our mandate and to do nothing else” and that the district court “must implement both the letter and the spirit of the appellate court’s mandate”
stating \the mandate rule requires a district court on remand to effect our mandate and to do nothing else” and that the district court \must implement both the letter and the spirit of the appellate court’s mandate”
“ ‘The mandate rule requires a district court on remand to effect our mandate and to do nothing else.’”
“The mandate rule requires a district court on remand to effect [the appellate court’s] mandate and to do nothing else.”
“[O]n remand the district court must implement both the letter and the spirit of the appellate court’s mandate[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Garza, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.