Skip to main content
· 2/19/2009

General Security Indemnity Co. of Arizona v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 205 P.3d 529
  • 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 215
  • 2009 WL 400053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the competing approaches and adopting the majority approach that faulty construction is not an occurrence under a CGL policy
  • discussing the competing approaches and adopting the majority approach that faulty construction is not an occurrence under a CGL policy
  • rejecting Hoang because, among other things, it would render superfluous the provision that excludes coverage for expected or intended damage
  • discussing the competing approaches and adopting the majority approach that faulty construction is not an occurrence under a CGL policy
  • discussing the competing approaches and adopting the majority approach that faulty construction is not an occurrence under a CGL policy
  • adopting the majority position and contrasting a CGL policy with a performance bond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taubman, Román, Lichtenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.