Skip to main content
· 2/15/1939

General Ry. Signal Co. v. Union Simplex Train Control Co.

Citations

  • 26 F. Supp. 325
  • 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 527
  • 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that plaintiff was not barred by doctrine of unclean hands when defendant had recovered from plaintiff for his misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nields

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.