General Parker v. Kevin Lyons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rooker-Feldman does not apply without a “final resolution in the state system”
• “Rooker-Feldman does not bar the claims of federal-court plaintiffs who … file a federal suit when a state-court appeal is pending.”
• “Rooker-Feldman does not bar the claims of federal-court plaintiffs who … file a federal suit when a state-court appeal is pending.”
• \Rooker–Feldman does not bar the claims of federal-court plaintiffs who . . . file a federal suit when a state-court appeal is pending.\
• “Rooker-Feldman does not bar the claims of federal-court plaintiffs who . . . file a federal suit when a state-court appeal is pending.”
• overruled in part on other grounds in Hadzi–Tanovic v. Johnson, 62 F.4th 394, 408 n.4 (7th Cir. 2023)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).