General Motors Corporation v. Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc., and Tong Yang Industry Company, Limited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a likelihood of confusion where four Frisch factors favored the plaintiff, two favored the alleged infringing party, and the remaining two factors were inapplicable
• “[Plaintiffs] argument that [defendant] ‘could anticipate the [infringement]’ does not meet the standard for contributory infringement.”
• “These genuine disputes of material fact render summary judgment inappropriate, a common disposition in evaluating likelihood of confusion.”
• “Expansion could be geographic or an increase in products or services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).