Skip to main content
· 12/6/1962

General Motors Corp. v. State

Citations

  • 376 P.2d 843
  • 60 Wash. 2d 862
  • 1962 Wash. LEXIS 388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding the imposition of B & O tax on an out-of-state company that shipped merchandise f.o.b., reasoning that \the substance of each transaction occurs in Washington where the customer is located.\
  • upholding the imposition of B&O tax on an out-of-state company that shipped merchandise F.O.B., reasoning that “the substance of each transaction occurs in Washington where the customer is located”
  • B & O tax upheld against charges of discrimination, applying the Goodrich analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.