· 1/4/2001
General Motors Corp. v. Schmitz
Citations
- 764 A.2d 838
- 362 Md. 229
- 2001 Md. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the statute at issue required that notice be “conspicuously disclosed to the consumer in writing”
- observing that the statute at issue required that notice be \conspicuously disclosed to the consumer in writing\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.