General Motors Corp. v. Phat Cat Carts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] plaintiffs showing that the defendant used identical trademarks constitutes circumstantial evidence sufficient to support a finding of actual dilution.”
• “It is usually recognized in trademark infringement cases that . . . infringement by its nature causes irreparable harm.”
• “It is usually recognized in trademark infringement cases that there is not an adequate remedy at law to redress infringement[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).