General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Yates Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that certain claims against the debtor’s co-defendants were not so “inextricably interwoven” so as to warrant imposing the bankruptcy stay on claims against the non-debtor co-defendants
• in action for conversion, court refused to extend stay to non-debtor codefendant, since defendants were jointly and severally liable for plaintiff’s damages
• stay did not extend to joint tort-feasors
• declining to stay as to joint tortfeasors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).