General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Updike

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, in context of unpreserved error, it is at least arguable that, with one exception, trial court’s written judgment, oral findings, and reference to incorporation of evidence in the record satisfied statute requiring findings
• declining to exercise discretion to review juvenile court’s failure to make findings under ORS 419B.476(2)(d
• declining to exercise discretion to review plain error when court failed to make required findings because, had the findings been requested, “the trial court easily could have complied with the request”
• declining to exercise discretion to review the juvenile court’s findings under ORS 419B.476(2)(d
• declining to exercise discretion to review plain error in failing to make required findings because, among other reasons, had the findings been requested, the trial court easily could have complied with the request
• declining to exercise discretion to review plain error in failing to make required findings because, among other reasons, had the findings been requested, the trial court easily could have complied with the request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).