General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rose (In Re Rose)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even though the contract in issue was non-exec-utory, the bankruptcy default clause could still not be enforced because it was contrary to the central purpose of the Bank ruptcy Code
• finding that even though the contract in issue was non-executory, the bankruptcy default clause could still not be enforced because it was contrary to the central purpose of the Bankruptcy Code
• refusing to enforce an ipso facto clause in a consumer Chapter 7 case because of its potential to impact the debtors’ fresh start

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).