Skip to main content
· 2/26/1904

General Gaslight Co. v. Matchless Mfg. Co.

Citations

  • 129 F. 137
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4738

Syllabus

<p>1. Patents — Invention—Designs.</p> <p>Originality and tbe exercise of the inventive faculty are as essential to give validity to a patent for a design as for a mechanical invention.</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>Whenever ingenuity is displayed in producing a new design which imparts to the eye a pleasing impression, even though it be the result of uniting old forms and parts, such production is patentable.</p> <p>3. Same — Inebingement—Design fob Lamp.</p> <p>The Humphrey design patent, No. 35,481, for a cluster gas lamp, shows a novel design and discloses invention. Also held infringed.</p> <p>4. Same.</p> <p>Where it appears that, by uniting old elements perceivable in other lamp designs, a new lamp of different contour and construction is produced, and where the collocated elements also impart an ornamental and graceful appearance, not possessed by prior lamp designs, the conception is beyond what an ordinarily skilled workman.is able to achieve.</p> <p>f 1. See Patents, vol. 38, Cent. Dig. § 33.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • record of the board of survey finding that the buoy was damaged beyond economic repair admissible because “[n]o particular degree of expertise would be required to make a determination if a particular buoy were damaged beyond economic repair”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hazel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.