GENERAL GAS CORPORATION v. Whitner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court did not err in permitting physicians to respond to the question “whether they observed anything about the plaintiff that would indicate he was a malingerer,” over objection that such testimony would be a conclusion of the witness and invade the province of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).