General Fireproofing Co. v. L. Wallace & Son

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a foreign administratrix lacked the capacity to sue under W. Va.Code 55-7-6 (1967)
• holding that “motions to amend should always be granted under Rule 15 when: (1) the amendment permits the presentation of the merits of the action; (2) the adverse party is not prejudiced by the sudden assertion of the subject of the amendment; and (3
• holding that “motions to amend should always be granted under Rule 15 when: (1) the amendment permits the presentation of the merits of the action; (2) the adverse party is not prejudiced by the sudden assertion of the subject of the amendment; and (3
• holding that “motions to amend should always be granted under Rule 15 when: (1) the amendment permits the presentation of the merits of the action; (2) the adverse party is not prejudiced by the sudden assertion of the subject of the amendment; and (3
• Justices Berry, Caplan, Haden and Sprouse concurring
• Justices Berry, Caplan, Haden and Sprouse concurring

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).