General Electro Music Corp., and General Music S.P.A. v. Samick Music Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he materiality of intentional false statements may be independent of the claims of the patent.\
• “[the submission of false or misleading statements] usually will support the conclusion … of an intentional scheme to deceive the PTO”
• false statement made in a petition to make special is material if “it succeeds in prompting expedited consideration of the application”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).