General Electric Company v. Wilkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no joint in-ventorship where the named inventors “had already conceived of their ... solution before corresponding with” the putative co-inventor
• finding no joint inventorship where the named inventors \had already conceived of their [invention] before corresponding with\ the putative co-inventor
• finding no joint inventorship where the named inventors “had already conceived of their [invention] before corresponding with” the putative co-inventor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).