General Electric Company v. Mv Nedlloyd, Her Engines, Boilers, Nedlloyd Lijnen B v. (Nedlloyd Lines)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ―[a]s an experienced shipper, [the plaintiff] obviously knew it could declare a higher value‖
• “[T]he language on the back of the [bill of lading] incorporating COGSA’s provisions and the space for declaring excess value on the front are sufficient notice of the limitation of liability and the means of avoiding it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).