General Electric Company v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• neither timing issue nor severity of potential penalty condemns section 106 UAO scheme under the Fifth Amendment based on GE’s textual challenge to CERCLA
• “[A] facial challenge to the text of a statute does not typically require discovery for resolution because the challenge focuses on the language of the statute itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).