General Electric Company v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• neither timing issue nor severity of potential penalty condemns section 106 UAO scheme under the Fifth Amendment based on GE’s textual challenge to CERCLA
• “[A] facial challenge to the text of a statute does not typically require discovery for resolution because the challenge focuses on the language of the statute itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• General Electric Co. v. Jackson
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-06-29· cited 123×
• General Electric Co. v. Jackson
  District of Columbia· 2009-01-27· cited 31×
• Rahman v. Johanns
  District of Columbia· 2007-08-07· cited 22×
• City of Rialto v. West Coast Loading Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-08-14· cited 20×
• Raytheon Aircraft Co. v. United States
  D. Kansas· 2007-08-10· cited 20×
• Raytheon Aircraft Co. v. United States
  D. Kansas· 2006-05-26· cited 15×
• Pactiv Corp. v. Chester
  E.D. Michigan· 2006-01-30· cited 3×
• Daskalea v. Washington Humane Society
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-09-09· cited 3×
• Dean v. Town of Hamden
  D. Connecticut· 2016-02-18· cited 2×
• General Electric Co. v. Browner
  District of Columbia· 2009-01-27
• Goodrich Corporation v. Usdod
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-08-14