General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an organization had standing to intervene where it had “submitted the declarations of several members” describing their claimed injuries
• granting permissive intervention and declining to reach intervention as a matter of right
• “[A]lthough the Eighth Circuit has not explicitly required that parties intervening under Rule 24(b)(1)(B) establish Article III standing, most district courts in this circuit to have considered the matter have done so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).