Skip to main content
· 11/9/1988

General Electric Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.

Citations

  • 698 F. Supp. 1181
  • 12 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1517
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing the doctrine narrowly to apply only when limitations of one claim are sought to be read into unlimited claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.