General Electric Co. v. Cain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summarizing relevant inquiries for determining whether work at issue is part of the regular or recurrent work of a business
• describing facts of work at issue in individual cases discussed in Cain opinion
• “[A] premises -8- owner who asserts exclusive remedy immunity must both plead and prove the affirmative defense.”
• “No evidence indicated that the project on which Rehm worked was significantly different from those that Brown-Forman employees performed.” (emphasis added)
• defendant “who asserts exclusive remedy immunity must both plead and prove the affirmative defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).