General Electric Capital Corp. v. Future Media Productions Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating Entz-White as good law, but concluding it did not apply to a claim paid in full as a result of asset sales outside of a Chapter 11 plan
• “As a result, the facts of Entz-White are distinguishable, and thus our per se rule from that case is inapplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).