General Aviation, Inc. v. The Cessna Aircraft Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a written integrated contract “by its own terms, [is] a full and complete expression of the parties’ intentions”, and therefore a claim of promissory estoppel is precluded
• explaining that, under Michigan law, the obligation of good faith does not override express contract terms
• finding plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of its sole remaining claim after trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of defendant on all other claims made order final under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), permitting an immediate appeal
• requiring the moving party to allege “facts which a reasonable person would believe would indicate a judge has a personal bias against the moving party. Conclusions, rumors, beliefs, and opinions are not sufficient to form a basis for disqualification.”
• “Conclusions, rumors, beliefs, and opinions are not sufficient to form a basis for disqualifica tion.”
• “[C]onclusions, rumors, beliefs, 22 and opinions are not sufficient to form a basis for disqualification.” (quoting Hinman v. 23 Rogers, 831 F.2d 937, 939 (10th Cir. 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).