Skip to main content
· 6/7/1996

General Analytics Corporation v. Cna Insurance Companies, D/B/A Valley Force Insurance Company, D/B/A Continental Casualty Company

Citations

  • 86 F.3d 51
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13573
  • 1996 WL 317055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an employee's words and conduct are probative of intent, and that the context in which the words and conduct occurred also is relevant
  • stating that an employee's words and conduct are probative of intent, and that the context in which the words and conduct occurred also is relevant
  • stating that an employee’s words and conduct are probative of intent, and that the context in which the words and conduct occurred also is relevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Niemeyer, Butzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.