General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Azar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Certainly it does not seem logical that the classic definition was intended by either the insurer or the insured in this case .... ”
• “[I]n ordinary usage [vandalism] is not limited to destruction of works of art, but has been broadened in its meaning to include the destruction of property generally.”
• “[T]he company had denied liability in any amount, which waives requirements of the policy as to notice and preliminary proof of loss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).