General Acc. Ins. Co. of America v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the rights of a third party beneficiary are subject to the same limitations as those of a party to the contract
• “Historically, [Pennsylvania courts have] held that third party beneficiaries are bound by the same limitations in the contract as the signatories of that contract.”
• where driver of automobile is not a named insured, he is a third-party beneficiary, subject to the same limitations [and, by the same analysis, the same benefits] in the policy as the parties to the insurance contract
• where driver of automobile is not a named insured, he is a third-party beneficiary, subject to the same limitations [and, by the same analysis, the same benefits] in the policy as the parties to the insurance contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).