Gene Trammel v. Simmons First Bank of Searcy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a time interval of more than two months was “too long to support an inference of causation”
• holding that claim could not proceed because of the lack of direct or circumstantial evidence without deciding effect of Desert Palace
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to recuse where the district judge informed the parties that her law clerk, who was a friend of a party in the case, had no involvement with the court’s handling of the case
• retaliating against an employee for filing an EEOC charge—a protected activity—is a violation of the ADEA
• ADEA plaintiff's letter-writing campaign accusing employer of improper loan procedures was not protected activity because the letters were not written to oppose age discrimination
• an “interval of more than two months is too long to support an inference of causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).