G.E.M. of St. Louis, Inc. v. City of Bloomington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that possibility of \a checkerboard of conflicting regulations\ is not enough to give rise to implied preemption, and suggesting that any confusion resulting from local regulation is a problem best remedied by a \clear expression of the legislative will\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).