GEM Holdco, LLC v. Changing World Technologies, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since neither party’s interpretation is clearly correct as a matter of law, the agreement is ambiguous and the court may consider extrinsic evidence, such as the other contracts entered into by the parties at the same time . . . to interpret the intent of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).