Gem Electronics of Monmouth, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[u]ndefined terms in a statute must be ascribed their ordinary and popularly understood meaning”
• noting that “[u]ndefined terms in a statute must be ascribed their ordinary and popularly understood meaning”
• noting that \[u]ndefined terms in a statute must be ascribed their ordinary and popularly understood meaning\
• noting that A[u]ndefined terms in a statute must be 10 1-03-1589 ascribed their ordinary and popularly understood meaning@
• “statutes imposing a tax are strictly construed against the government and in favor of the taxpayer”
• “[a]n act is not unconstitutionally vague merely because one can conjure up a hypothetical which brings the meaning of some terms into question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).