Gelsomino v. Gorov

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]erely characterizing an act or omission as a matter of judgment does not end the inquiry.”
• plaintiffs presented numerous examples of evidence that could have been presented at trial such that the proffered testimony by plaintiffs indicate an issue of fact as to proximate cause remains

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).