Skip to main content
· 2/17/2000

Gellington v. Christian Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc.

Citations

  • 203 F.3d 1299
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2349
  • 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,275
  • 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 40
  • 2000 WL 192100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a constructive discharge claim based on a reassignment was barred by the ministerial exception
  • holding that government interference with clergy employment matters violates the Free Exercise Clause
  • holding that government interference with clergy employment matters violates the Free Exercise Clause
  • barring Title VII claim by minister alleging constructive discharge and retaliation after being reassigned to church 800 miles away from his home with substantial reduction in salary
  • \Investigation . . . into a church's employment of its clergy would almost always entail excessive government entangle-ment into the internal management of the church.\
  • governmental “interference with a church’s ability to select and manage its own clergy” would violate both the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Godbold, Fay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.