Geller v. David's Art, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was not error to allow the State to question the defendant’s husband about a lawsuit that he and the defendant had filed against the arresting officer
• noting that a trial judge may allow evidence “of a pending civil lawsuit when it arises out of the same circumstances as the matter before him”
• trial court properly excluded evidence of expert testimony on the issue of mental condition when the defendant failed to provide written notice to the state and failed to file a copy of the notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).