Gel Systems Inc. v. Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s drawing of such inference after a bench trial
• affirming district court’s drawing of such inference after a bench trial
• where trial judge relied on written agreement and extrinsic evidence, findings would be set aside only if clearly erroneous
• \clear error\ review where court utilizes extrinsic evidence, as well as documents, to interpret parties' ambiguous contractual relation- ship
• party's intention to contract is question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).