Geisinger v. Beyl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \absence of the juvenile's address on the petition did not prevent the trial court from exercising subject matter jurisdiction over this juvenile action\
• \absence of the juvenile's address on the petition did not prevent the trial court from exercising subject matter jurisdiction over this juvenile action\
• “A juvenile abuse, neglect, or dependency action is a creature of statute and is commenced by the filing of a petition, which constitutes the initial pleading in such actions.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “[W]hen a statute is clear and unambiguous, [courts] will give effect to its plain meaning and will not entertain a contextual determination of legislative intent.” (citing State v. Bryant, 361 N.C. 100, 102, 637 S.E.2d 532, 534 (2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).