Skip to main content
· 2/16/1900

Geiselman v. Shomo

Citations

  • 13 Pa. Super. 1
  • 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 102

Syllabus

<p>Appeals — Bond—Action on — When appeal not a supersedeas — Practice, O. P.</p> <p>Where an appeal is taken after the date when such an appeal operates as a supersedeas, and the plaintiff treats the appeal as a nullity and proceeds with his execution to a sale of the defendant’s real estate just as though no appeal had been taken, and the defendant upon the appeal being non prossed pays the costs; it is apparent that no benefit or advantage to the defendant and no delay or loss to the plaintiff followed the appeal, and hence plaintiff may not recover on the bond any deficiency of his judgment not realized on the execution.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Beeber, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.