Geis v. Markling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the United States was the place through which contract was made where foreign airline had interline agreement with second foreign airline that sold tickets in the United States for travel on the first foreign airline
• office of an originating carrier is a \place of business\ under the venue provision of the Warsaw Convention
• office of an originating carrier is a “place of business” under the venue provision of the Warsaw Convention
• Warsaw Convention involved only on question of jurisdiction and venue
• Warsaw Convention involved only on question of jurisdiction and venue
• “The central purpose of Article 28(1)‘s third 7 ||provision was to make venue always proper in the country where the ticket was 8 || purchased—assuming it is a High Contracting Party— if, but only if, the defendant 9 ||has a place of business there.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).