Geiger v. Crestar Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a party to terms in “Rules and Regulations” mentioned multiple times in account documents where the party “acknowledged that he received a copy” of the relevant documents
• holding a party 19 to terms in “Rules and Regulations” mentioned multiple times in account documents where the party “acknowledged that he received a copy” of the relevant documents
• referring to case law supporting “the proposition that a lender undertakes a duty to a borrower when its employees make certain assurances to the borrower during the loan negotiation process”
• analyzing an “account agreement” that “incorporated” other rules and regulations into the contract
• “[A] bank generally owes no fiduciary duty to its depositors.” (quoting Miller v. Am. Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Chi., 4 F.3d 518, 520 (7th Cir. 1993))
• no special relationship where parties’ interactions were limited to contractual agreement and no facts “detailing a history of interaction between Mr. Geiger and Crestar which extended their relationship beyond the provisions of the account agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).