Skip to main content
· 2/22/2002

Geier Bros. Farms v. Furst-McNess Co.

Citations

  • 186 F. Supp. 2d 798
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3249
  • 2002 WL 312820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiffs breach of express warranty claim, “[b]ecause whether the alleged promise of increased production was mere puffing is a question for the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.